Not sure whether it's personal feeling or not, but in the voting page I see on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 for "accept" and 10 for "reject" is quite counter-intuitive.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Kiersten Gaffney <[email protected]> wrote: > If you haven't already, please take a few minutes the next few days and > review what members of the community have submitted! > > Voting forms close TODAY, Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST > > A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up > significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last > year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for > community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should > be included in the program. > > In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve > segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users. > > Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj > > Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos. > > Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp > > A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and > operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc). > > The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you > didn't see proposed but would like to attend. > > Thanks in advance for your participation! > > Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee) >
