Hiya Vinod, thanks again for chiming in!

Both frameworks are indeed binding to the same IP/interface, the kafka-mesos 
scheduler has LIBPROCESS_IP set, per its’ docs.

strace tells me that it tries to connect and then pretty much goes quiet. this 
socket does show as ESTABLISHED in netstat.

—
0419 13:11:49.881398 30511 sched.cpp:222] Version: 0.27.1
I0419 13:11:49.890899 30556 sched.cpp:326] New master detected at 
[email protected]:5050
[pid 30556] connect(43, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(5050), 
sin_addr=inet_addr("10.100.1.158")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in 
progress)
I0419 13:11:49.892683 30556 sched.cpp:336] No credentials provided. Attempting 
to register without authentication
[pid 30531] +++ exited with 0 +++
Process 30578 attached
[pid 30552] +++ exited with 0 +++
--

From: Vinod Kone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 1:08 PM
To: user <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: kafka-mesos still refusing to launch brokers on one cluster


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Justin Ryan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Marathon has no trouble registering a framework and launching jobs on this 
cluster, only kafka-mesos. :/


Are both these frameworks binding to the same IP/interface? Does anyone of them 
use any LIBPROCESS_IP or LIBPROCESS_PORT env variables?
________________________________

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's confidential 
business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is 
prohibited and may be unlawful. The sender believes that this E-mail and any 
attachments were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code 
when sent. This message and its attachments could have been infected during 
transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient 
accepts full responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about 
viruses and other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or 
damage arising in any way.

Reply via email to