Currently (0.28+), the reserved resources are also account into quota. For
your case, the framework will get the 50 reserved CPU and 50 CPU from "*";
the other 100 CPU will NOT offer to this framework even no other frameworks.

----
Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer
Platform OpenSource Technology, STG, IBM GCG
+86-10-8245 4084 | [email protected] | http://k82.me

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:42 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Will it take the 50 CPUs from the reservations and just block another 50
> CPUs from other slaves within the cluster?
> Is the framework written by yourself? This depends on how your framework
> implement resourceOffers. Suppose you assign your framework with `bar` and
> reserved by this role as well. You still could accept the offer which role
> is "*" in `Scheduler::resourceOffers`.
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Sebastian Kuepers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I have a framework, wich I want to guarantee ressources on my cluster -
>> independently from the slaves.
>>
>> Let's say 100 CPU on a 200 CPU cluster.
>>
>>
>> I could very well use quotas for that. I create a role for this framework
>> and create the quota for this role with the 100 CPUs.
>>
>>
>> But in my cluster I have a couple of slaves, which are great for the
>> framework to run on, because they have a lot of memory for example.
>>
>>
>> But they can only provide 50 of the 100 CPU I want to get for sure for
>> this framework.​
>>
>> So I would do start these slaves with reservations for this role.
>>
>>
>> Does the quota mechanism, now take this into account, when trying to
>> block and allocate resources for this framework?
>>
>>
>> Will it take the 50 CPUs from the reservations and just block another 50
>> CPUs from other slaves within the cluster?
>>
>>
>> Thanks for you help,
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain
>> proprietary and confidential information that is intended for the
>> addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or use of
>> the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our
>> clients or vendors, any information contained in this e-mail or any
>> attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any governing
>> contract. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
>> contact the sender and delete the e-mail.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Haosdent Huang
>

Reply via email to