OK, good - that part looks as expected, you've had a successful
election for a leader
(and yes that sounds like your zookeeper layer is ok).

You need the 2nd command line (i.e. you have to specify all the zk
nodes on each master, it's
not like e.g. Cassandra where you can discover other nodes from the
first one you talk to).

The error you were getting was about the internal registry /
replicated log, which is a mesos master level thing.
You could try when Sivaram suggested - stopping the mesos master
processes, wiping their
work_dirs and starting them back up.
Perhaps some wonky state got in there while you were trying various options?


On 5 June 2016 at 00:34, Qian Zhang <zhq527...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Vinod and Dick.
>
> I think my 3 ZK servers have formed a quorum, each of them has the following
> config:
>     $ cat conf/zoo.cfg
>     server.1=192.168.122.132:2888:3888
>     server.2=192.168.122.225:2888:3888
>     server.3=192.168.122.171:2888:3888
>     autopurge.purgeInterval=6
>     autopurge.snapRetainCount=5
>     initLimit=10
>     syncLimit=5
>     maxClientCnxns=0
>     clientPort=2181
>     tickTime=2000
>     quorumListenOnAllIPs=true
>     dataDir=/home/stack/packages/zookeeper-3.4.8/snapshot
>     dataLogDir=/home/stack/packages/zookeeper-3.4.8/transactions
>
> And when I run "bin/zkServer.sh status" on each of them, I can see "Mode:
> leader" for one, and "Mode: follower" for the other two.
>
> I have already tried to manually start 3 masters simultaneously, and here is
> what I see in their log:
> In 192.168.122.171(this is the first master I started):
>     I0605 07:12:49.418721  1187 detector.cpp:152] Detected a new leader:
> (id='25')
>     I0605 07:12:49.419276  1186 group.cpp:698] Trying to get
> '/mesos/log_replicas/0000000024' in ZooKeeper
>     I0605 07:12:49.420013  1188 group.cpp:698] Trying to get
> '/mesos/json.info_0000000025' in ZooKeeper
>     I0605 07:12:49.423807  1188 zookeeper.cpp:259] A new leading master
> (UPID=master@192.168.122.171:5050) is detected
>     I0605 07:12:49.423841  1186 network.hpp:461] ZooKeeper group PIDs: {
> log-replica(1)@192.168.122.171:5050 }
>     I0605 07:12:49.424281  1187 master.cpp:1951] The newly elected leader is
> master@192.168.122.171:5050 with id cdc459d4-a05f-4f99-9bf4-1ee9a91d139b
>     I0605 07:12:49.424895  1187 master.cpp:1964] Elected as the leading
> master!
>
> In 192.168.122.225 (second master I started):
>     I0605 07:12:51.918702  2246 detector.cpp:152] Detected a new leader:
> (id='25')
>     I0605 07:12:51.919983  2246 group.cpp:698] Trying to get
> '/mesos/json.info_0000000025' in ZooKeeper
>     I0605 07:12:51.921910  2249 network.hpp:461] ZooKeeper group PIDs: {
> log-replica(1)@192.168.122.171:5050 }
>     I0605 07:12:51.925721  2252 replica.cpp:673] Replica in EMPTY status
> received a broadcasted recover request from (6)@192.168.122.225:5050
>     I0605 07:12:51.927891  2246 zookeeper.cpp:259] A new leading master
> (UPID=master@192.168.122.171:5050) is detected
>     I0605 07:12:51.928444  2246 master.cpp:1951] The newly elected leader is
> master@192.168.122.171:5050 with id cdc459d4-a05f-4f99-9bf4-1ee9a91d139b
>
> In 192.168.122.132 (last master I started):
> I0605 07:12:53.553949 16426 detector.cpp:152] Detected a new leader:
> (id='25')
> I0605 07:12:53.555179 16429 group.cpp:698] Trying to get
> '/mesos/json.info_0000000025' in ZooKeeper
> I0605 07:12:53.560045 16428 zookeeper.cpp:259] A new leading master
> (UPID=master@192.168.122.171:5050) is detected
>
> So right after I started these 3 masters, the first one (192.168.122.171)
> was successfully elected as leader, but after 60s, 192.168.122.171 failed
> with the error mentioned in my first mail, and then 192.168.122.225 was
> elected as leader, but it failed with the same error too after another 60s,
> and the same thing happened to the last one (192.168.122.132). So after
> about 180s, all my 3 master were down.
>
> I tried both:
>     sudo ./bin/mesos-master.sh --zk=zk://127.0.0.1:2181/mesos --quorum=2
> --work_dir=/var/lib/mesos/master
> and
>     sudo ./bin/mesos-master.sh
> --zk=zk://192.168.122.132:2181,192.168.122.171:2181,192.168.122.225:2181/mesos
> --quorum=2 --work_dir=/var/lib/mesos/master
> And I see the same error for both.
>
> 192.168.122.132, 192.168.122.225 and 192.168.122.171 are 3 VMs which are
> running on a KVM hypervisor host.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Qian Zhang
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Dick Davies <d...@hellooperator.net> wrote:
>>
>> You told the master it needed a quorum of 2 and it's the only one
>> online, so it's bombing out.
>> That's the expected behaviour.
>>
>> You need to start at least 2 zookeepers before it will be a functional
>> group, same for the masters.
>>
>> You haven't mentioned how you setup your zookeeper cluster, so i'm
>> assuming that's working
>> correctly (3 nodes, all aware of the other 2 in their config). If not,
>> you need to sort that out first.
>>
>>
>> Also I think your zk URL is wrong - you want to list all 3 zookeeper
>> nodes like this:
>>
>> sudo ./bin/mesos-master.sh
>> --zk=zk://host1:2181,host2:2181,host3:2181/mesos --quorum=2
>> --work_dir=/var/lib/mesos/master
>>
>> when you've run that command on 2 hosts things should start working,
>> you'll want all 3 up for
>> redundancy.
>>
>> On 4 June 2016 at 16:42, Qian Zhang <zhq527...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > I am trying to set up a Mesos HA env with 3 nodes, each of nodes has a
>> > Zookeeper running, so they form a Zookeeper cluster. And then when I
>> > started
>> > the first Mesos master in one node with:
>> >     sudo ./bin/mesos-master.sh --zk=zk://127.0.0.1:2181/mesos --quorum=2
>> > --work_dir=/var/lib/mesos/master
>> >
>> > I found it will hang here for 60 seconds:
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.488219 15330 zookeeper.cpp:259] A new leading master
>> > (UPID=master@192.168.122.132:5050) is detected
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.489080 15337 master.cpp:1951] The newly elected leader
>> > is
>> > master@192.168.122.132:5050 with id 40d387a6-4d61-49d6-af44-51dd41457390
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.489791 15337 master.cpp:1964] Elected as the leading
>> > master!
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.490401 15337 master.cpp:1651] Recovering from registrar
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.491706 15330 registrar.cpp:332] Recovering registrar
>> >   I0604 23:39:56.496448 15332 log.cpp:524] Attempting to start the
>> > writer
>> >
>> > And after 60s, master will fail:
>> > F0604 23:40:56.499596 15337 master.cpp:1640] Recovery failed: Failed to
>> > recover registrar: Failed to perform fetch within 1mins
>> > *** Check failure stack trace: ***
>> >     @     0x7f4b81372f4e  google::LogMessage::Fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b81372e9a  google::LogMessage::SendToLog()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8137289c  google::LogMessage::Flush()
>> >     @     0x7f4b813757b0  google::LogMessageFatal::~LogMessageFatal()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8040eea0  mesos::internal::master::fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b804dbeb3
>> >
>> > _ZNSt5_BindIFPFvRKSsS1_EPKcSt12_PlaceholderILi1EEEE6__callIvJS1_EJLm0ELm1EEEET_OSt5tupleIJDpT0_EESt12_Index_tupleIJXspT1_EEE
>> >     @     0x7f4b804ba453
>> > _ZNSt5_BindIFPFvRKSsS1_EPKcSt12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEclIJS1_EvEET0_DpOT_
>> >     @     0x7f4b804898d7
>> >
>> > _ZZNK7process6FutureI7NothingE8onFailedISt5_BindIFPFvRKSsS6_EPKcSt12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEvEERKS2_OT_NS2_6PreferEENUlS6_E_clES6_
>> >     @     0x7f4b804dbf80
>> >
>> > _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFvRKSsEZNK7process6FutureI7NothingE8onFailedISt5_BindIFPFvS1_S1_EPKcSt12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEvEERKS6_OT_NS6_6PreferEEUlS1_E_E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataS1_
>> >     @           0x49d257  std::function<>::operator()()
>> >     @           0x49837f
>> >
>> > _ZN7process8internal3runISt8functionIFvRKSsEEJS4_EEEvRKSt6vectorIT_SaIS8_EEDpOT0_
>> >     @           0x493024  process::Future<>::fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8015ad20  process::Promise<>::fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b804d9295  process::internal::thenf<>()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8051788f
>> >
>> > _ZNSt5_BindIFPFvRKSt8functionIFN7process6FutureI7NothingEERKN5mesos8internal8RegistryEEERKSt10shared_ptrINS1_7PromiseIS3_EEERKNS2_IS7_EEESB_SH_St12_PlaceholderILi1EEEE6__callIvISM_EILm0ELm1ELm2EEEET_OSt5tupleIIDpT0_EESt12_Index_tupleIIXspT1_EEE
>> >     @     0x7f4b8050fa3b  std::_Bind<>::operator()<>()
>> >     @     0x7f4b804f94e3  std::_Function_handler<>::_M_invoke()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8050fc69  std::function<>::operator()()
>> >     @     0x7f4b804f9609
>> >
>> > _ZZNK7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEE5onAnyIRSt8functionIFvRKS4_EEvEES8_OT_NS4_6PreferEENUlS8_E_clES8_
>> >     @     0x7f4b80517936
>> >
>> > _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFvRKN7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEEEEZNKS5_5onAnyIRSt8functionIS8_EvEES7_OT_NS5_6PreferEEUlS7_E_E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataS7_
>> >     @     0x7f4b8050fc69  std::function<>::operator()()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8056b1b4  process::internal::run<>()
>> >     @     0x7f4b80561672  process::Future<>::fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8059bf5f  std::_Mem_fn<>::operator()<>()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8059757f
>> >
>> > _ZNSt5_BindIFSt7_Mem_fnIMN7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEEEFbRKSsEES6_St12_PlaceholderILi1EEEE6__callIbIS8_EILm0ELm1EEEET_OSt5tupleIIDpT0_EESt12_Index_tupleIIXspT1_EEE
>> >     @     0x7f4b8058fad1
>> >
>> > _ZNSt5_BindIFSt7_Mem_fnIMN7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEEEFbRKSsEES6_St12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEclIJS8_EbEET0_DpOT_
>> >     @     0x7f4b80585a41
>> >
>> > _ZZNK7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEE8onFailedISt5_BindIFSt7_Mem_fnIMS4_FbRKSsEES4_St12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEbEERKS4_OT_NS4_6PreferEENUlS9_E_clES9_
>> >     @     0x7f4b80597605
>> >
>> > _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFvRKSsEZNK7process6FutureIN5mesos8internal8RegistryEE8onFailedISt5_BindIFSt7_Mem_fnIMS8_FbS1_EES8_St12_PlaceholderILi1EEEEbEERKS8_OT_NS8_6PreferEEUlS1_E_E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataS1_
>> >     @           0x49d257  std::function<>::operator()()
>> >     @           0x49837f
>> >
>> > _ZN7process8internal3runISt8functionIFvRKSsEEJS4_EEEvRKSt6vectorIT_SaIS8_EEDpOT0_
>> >     @     0x7f4b8056164a  process::Future<>::fail()
>> >     @     0x7f4b8055a378  process::Promise<>::fail()
>> >
>> > I tried both Zookeeper 3.4.8 and 3.4.6 with latest code of Mesos, but no
>> > luck for both. Any ideas about what happened? Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Qian Zhang
>
>

Reply via email to