Robert, I just checked the code and the ordering is not guaranteed since we parallelize the download currently.
This sounds like a feature request. Robert, do you want to create a ticket? For now, i think a startup script should be able to workaround that. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Robert Lacroix <[email protected]> wrote: > Jie, would it hurt if we would guarantee ordering of URIs? I could see use > cases where the order in which files are extracted matters. Protobuf > preserves ordering of repeated fields, so it shouldn't be a huge effort (it > probably already works). > > Robert > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 7:37 PM, Jie Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is no ordering assumption in the API. > > - Jie > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Wil Yegelwel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm curious whether there is an ordering assumption on the CommandInfo >> protobuf or if the order does not matter. The comment in mesos.proto, "Any >> URIs specified are fetched before executing the command" seems to imply >> that ordering does not matter. I just wanted to confirm that was the case. >> >> Thanks, >> Wil >> > > >
