Is it published anywhere that moving the deployment to the above mentioned methods is on the current roadmap? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-21105?filter=-4 (There are quite a few so I may have missed it)
Until the alternate deployment methods are in place; I feel a cloud formation template would be beneficial to the community. Being able to deploy this as something as simple a a cloud formation stack can get many more using this great tool. So personally I would love that template Satish; if you get started and have this in a public repo; I'd be able to help with PRs. (With my new exposure to Metron; I am not sure I'm the best candidate to start on this) >From my experience much of the customization would be happening in the userdata which can easily be modified once the alternate deployment methods exist. Just my .02. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Satish Abburi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree – good to have cloud neutral. I still think, we might end up with > some custom wrapper for specific cloud provider. > > Here is a good comparison of the two popular cloud vendor templates. > https://www.cloudenablers.com/blog/comparing-aws-cloudformation-and-azure- > resource-manager/ > > > On 5/23/17, 12:59 PM, "Simon Elliston Ball" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This might be a neater solution than the current ansible build, > however, it might also be worth considering something more cloud neutral, > since more and more of the project is moving into ambari, blueprints and > cloud break might also be an option worth looking at. > > Simon > > > On 23 May 2017, at 21:49, Satish Abburi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Want to check with community before we invest to create one? If we > don’t have one, can we leverage any existing scripts to create this. > > > > Thanks, > > Satish > > > > > -- -J
