Actually, and I am shocked to find myself saying this, MaaS won't help you
here. ;)  I don't think the current system can encode your desire.  Just in
case I'm being dense, though, would you give us a concrete example with
some rules and how you'd like the score aggregated?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Ali Nazemian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, Casey and Nick. Is there any way that we can somehow overcome this
> requirement with the current features? Exclude MAAS.
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Nick Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ali -
>>
>> Here are some issues in JIRA related to this topic.  Feel free to add
>> commentary or specifics of your use case to either of these issues.
>> Feedback will only help improve the final result.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-683
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-685
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> That's correct that it's the last step.  Honestly, the threat triage
>>> functions were added prior to Stellar really being a thing.  We should
>>> allow arbitrary stellar statements in there rather than a fixed approach,
>>> so it's pluggable.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Ali Nazemian <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I know there are four different Treat Triage aggregation functions we
>>>> can use for the case of triggering multiple rules. These functions are
>>>> "max', "min", "mean", "positive mean". I was wondering whether there is any
>>>> way I can implement the following logic with the Treat Triage functions for
>>>> a non-deterministic score.
>>>>
>>>> In the case that a specific rule is triggered, I want to boost the
>>>> final result of Treat Triage score with a specific value. For example +20
>>>> to the score or multiply that by a specific value!
>>>>
>>>> Treat Triage is the last bolt in enrichment topology so it seems I
>>>> cannot have any additional enrichment/transformation based on the score
>>>> value. Is that right?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ali
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> A.Nazemian
>

Reply via email to