Hi Simon,

Thank you for the quick response. The use case is not completely interactive to 
be honest. The users can submit transactions  or batches and they can be 
"accepted" in the UI. We are then looking at running them them through the 
detection system and before they are finally submitted to the processing 
system. We have a bit of a freedom in what we do once the transactions/orders 
have been received.

I think that does give me enough confidence to go ahead and prototype a 
solution. Thank you once again.

I'm busy deploying the local vagrant image and will keep you posted of the 
findings.

Best regards,
Sanket
________________________________
From: Simon Elliston Ball <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 12:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Use case question

Hi Sanket,

This is certainly an interesting case. Metron is deliberately designed for 
flexibility in terms of ingest and schema, so that non-network data sources and 
use cases can be accommodated. The one caveat I would suggest is that the 
Metron pipeline is designed for analytics and detection, but not necessarily 
for the kind of guaranteed latency you might need for something like a web 
application experience. While it is streaming and realtime by nature, it can in 
some circumstances take a second or so to get a message from end to end, 
particularly if you have a lot of detection or models running, so it's not 
ideal as part of an interactive process. That said, for the actual detection of 
fraud, and strange behaviour patterns on your website, it would be a great fit.

Hope that helps,
Simon

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 02:04, Hammad 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Following!!

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:29 PM Sanket Sharma 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hi,

I've been looking at metron for a few days now and I have a unique use - 
thought of asking the experts if it makes sense to use metron in this scenario.

My understanding of the project so far is that its a framework built for 
analyzing cybersecurity threats. This includes analyzing IP packets, network 
traffics, URLs etc to calculate risk scores etc. The framework also enables 
data scientists to build and test their models. There are data collection 
plugins that collect data from variety of sources, stream it over kafka and 
makes them available for use by various models.

Now, we have a customer facing portal where customers login, submit all kinds 
of orders and transactions. We were looking at ways to analyze fraud that 
originates from our portal and I stumbled upon Metron. While we can definitely 
use Metron for analyzing source traffic, but would it be a good idea to use 
Metron to analyze the actual transactions themselves? I do understand that we 
will have to build our models etc. but given that all the heavy lifting is 
already done, I'm tempted to try Metron for this use case (instead of 
re-inventing the wheel).

Is this possible/recommended? Or would you recommend using Metron strictly for 
network related analysis?

Best Regards,
Sanket


--
--
simon elliston ball
@sireb

Reply via email to