Oh, it appears that attachments get stripped off sending to the mailing
lists.  Maybe you can make the comment on the PR (
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/260) and link to it here?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Anand Subramanian <
asubraman...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Would the Storm topology visualization diagram work for the parser,
> enrichment and indexing illustration?
>
> Attached is a sample image for the parser topology. I can work on getting
> rid of the numbers beneath the names.
>
> Cheers,
> Anand
>
> From: Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "user@metron.incubator.apache.org" <
> user@metron.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:03 PM
> To: "d...@metron.incubator.apache.org" <d...@metron.incubator.apache.org>
> Cc: "user@metron.incubator.apache.org" <user@metron.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] METRON-433: Documentation update
>
> I do think that's a good idea.  Unfortunately, I made those images in
> powerpoint and I don't know how to get stencils with the storm symbols on
> them.  Does anyone want to volunteer to transition the architecture docs
> over to use storm symbols?
>
> Best,
>
> Casey
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:30 AM, zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Do you think it would be worthwhile to revise the enrichment and parser
>> illustrations to use storm component symbols instead of generic symbols?
>> That may add additional clarity to people who aren't familiar with all of
>> the different components and how they work together.  Still running
>> through
>> the updated docs but so far it's great stuff.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:18 PM Kevin Waterson <kevin.water...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a revised document for installation that I would like to
>> > contribute. (ubuntu).
>> > What I have not found is an easily accessible of contributing. This may
>> be
>> > due to my time poor life where I simply do not have the time to be
>> > searching for such a link.
>> > Where can I find community contributions link?
>> >
>> > Kev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I noticed that our public facing docs were really getting stale.  This
>> is
>> >> a normal thing in a fast moving project, but I imagine it's really
>> hard for
>> >> the community to get engaged with a project that has such details
>> caught up
>> >> inside of code and unit tests.  As such, I thought it is reasonable to
>> >> spend a little time ensuring the docs are better organized and clear,
>> so I
>> >> spent the day focusing on that:
>> >>
>> >
>> >>    1. they were nonexistent in a lot of places like model as a service
>> >>    which are new
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    1. they were stale (mostly around stellar functions)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    1. they were incomplete (parsers take configs, we don't document
>> >>    that..we now do)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    1. they were not clear. I added some clarification and pictures of
>> >>    the topologies
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    1. they were in the wrong place (e.g. enrichment config
>> documentation
>> >>    was in metron-common instead of metron-enrichment)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    1. there wasn't a starting place from the top level Readme into the
>> >>    scary subdepths of the individual projects
>> >>
>> >> I also gave a small fully worked example for some of the commonly
>> >> confusing tasks, like doing a stellar enrichment or deploying a MaaS
>> >> model.  I wrote them up, but they were caught up inside of PR comments,
>> >> this just brought them into the docs.
>> >>
>> >
>> >> You can find the PR here
>> >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/260>. It's already
>> >> gotten a +1, but I'd love to see some discussion around what ELSE we
>> can do
>> >> to make it easier to get community contributions.  After all, there
>> would
>> >> be no Metron without its community.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Casey
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
>> > Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
>> >
>> --
>>
>> Jon
>>
>
>

Reply via email to