On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Emiliano wrote:
> Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> 
> > How about mgd_mod_midgard(URI, ENV) which returns proper midgard structure
> > and does roughly the same as mod_midgard (except for blobs)?
> 
> The mimetype trick is going to be way easier to do. A few lines in
> mod_midgard. Doing the above would involve more work. Then there's
> the issue of what database to select. mod_midgard gets this
> information from httpd.conf.
I hadn't read your answers about mimetype trick befor answering :-)
Indeed, it is easier and more secure
 
> All in all, the mimetype trick is easier and cleaner IMO, with the
> only 'drawback' that you can't service a request in vhost A and have
> it connect to the database of vhost B. Which is not something I'd
> allow servers I manage anyhow. It fully destroys the multidb or
> sitegroups barrier.
It is security considerations and they are reasonable, I don't think
that it is 'drawback', maybe 'security feature'? :-)
-- 
Sincerely yours, Alexander Bokovoy 
  The Midgard Project   | www.midgard-project.org |    Aurora R&D team 
Minsk Linux Users Group |    www.minsk-lug.net    |  www.aurora-linux.com  
   IPLabs Linux Team    |     linux.iplabs.ru     | Architecte Open Source
-- Great minds run in great circles.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to