David Guerizec wrote:
> > I would vote against this. The __table__ parameter is for internal use
> > only and is virtually guaranteed to be gone with Midgard 2.0.
>
> ok, what about a __type__ field then, containing the type or classname
> of object (ie. __type__="attachment" for __table__="blobs", etc.)
>
> not necessary for this function/method, but for future enhancement...
Personally I think this is brittle. If there's good use for it I won't
object but it doesn't have my preference.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
