Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > OK, I thought about forcing changes and the basic --force idea is > > flawed, since it would screw up all the date stamps at once. But what > > about an easy way (for humans) to mark a record as updated? I know you > > could change the timestamp, but figuring that out is not easy. > > Then it should be documented. Even if it were documented, caclculating the proper timestamp is inconvenient. That's what I meant with 'figuring out is not easy'. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Robin Jackson
- RE: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Emiliano
- RE: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Robin Jackson
- Re: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Emiliano
- RE: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Robin Jackson
- Re: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Emiliano
- [midgard-user] CVS Bootstrap Robin Jackson
- Re: [midgard-user] CVS Bootstrap Emiliano
- RE: [midgard-user] 1.2.5 to 1.4 Qu... Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard questions.. Alexander Bokovoy
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard questions.... Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard quest... Alexander Bokovoy
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard quest... Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard quest... Alexander Bokovoy
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard quest... Enrique Vega
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard quest... Alexander Bokovoy
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard questions.. Alexander Bokovoy
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard questions.. John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] repligard questions.. Emiliano
