Alexander Bokovoy wrote:

> > OK, I thought about forcing changes and the basic --force idea is
> > flawed, since it would screw up all the date stamps at once. But what
> > about an easy way (for humans) to mark a record as updated? I know you
> > could change the timestamp, but figuring that out is not easy.
>
> Then it should be documented.

Even if it were documented, caclculating the proper timestamp is
inconvenient. That's what I meant with 'figuring out is not easy'.

Emile


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to