John P . Looney wrote: > > BTW, since *->sitegroup is not one of the largest field, we could > > include it in the *->fetch()... > > Pretty please ? It would make traversing lists with fetch a lot easier on > sitegroup based systems... Now in a cvs near you. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups David Guerizec
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups David Guerizec
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups David Guerizec
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Enrique Vega
- [midgard-user] pages: dividing into Rogaty
- Re: [midgard-user] pages: dividing into Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] pages: dividing into Rogaty
- Re: [midgard-user] pages: dividing intoZ Emiliano
- Re: [midgard-user] pages: dividing into John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups John P . Looney
- Re: [midgard-user] toptics & sitegroups Enrique Vega
