David Guerizec wrote:
> > Personally, I'd be willing to settle for WYSIWYG (as opposed to WYSIWYM)
> > tools, but I can't find one that's usuable right now.
>
> Have a look at http://www.texmacs.org/
> ok, TeX + emacs is maybe not the best solution, but Joris plans to add an XML
>converter Really Soon Now (TM).
Hmm, I don't see how this differs significantly from LyX. Anyhow, I've
used LaTeX for quite a while. It's a good tool, but for our purposes
it brings together the downsides of docbook (lotsa tags to remember)
and wysiwyg. I've been working with AbiWord and KWord a bit. They're
both still too verbose to my liking, but I don't see many contenders.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
