Robin Jackson wrote:
> Is the .html extension required now? If it is, I'd like to but my vote in to keep
>the old method, as we have thousands of elements / external code that worked under
>1.2.5 that DON'T have the extension.
>
> (I've noticed this "problem" only under Opera though so is there something that
>Opera is doing differently?)
The extension isn't required. I can't imagine what Opera would be doing
different (and I don't have a copy), but Netscape, Mozilla and Konqueror
all work OK without the .html
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
