[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if you mix --with-adminsite and --with-asgard, you will get the adminsite
> twice, leading to duplicates. Only selecting --with-asgard will give you
> both asgard and the adminsite. The latter should be preferred IMHO, as
> the adminsite you get then will have the snippet administration bit, if
> you use --with-adminsite you will get the _very old_ version.
OK, I'll address this later. Or we can indeed drop the
--with-adminsite. Wouldn't hurt me one bit.
> Which is indeed caused by mixing --with-asgard and --with-adminsite. This
> is a bug, those options should be mutually exclusive, OR --with-adminsite
> should be gone.
OK with either one, votes please.
> Now there is some bug in that code too: CVS from yesterday give in the
> above situation :
>
> [Thu May 31 19:41:09 2001] [debug] mod_midgard.c(87): [client
> 195.241.5.191] Midgard: basic auth failed ((null))
>
> and sometimes I even saw:
>
> [Thu May 31 19:13:20 2001] [debug] mod_midgard.c(87): [client
> 195.241.5.191] Midgard: basic auth failed (topic)
>
> Which absolutely doesn't make sense to me. I looked at the code, and it
> appears to me that this (topic) can not happen ever....?
Buffer over/underrun. That's bad. Are -lib and mod_midgard matched? I
added some code to do basic limit checking, and mod_midgard will now
also report the reason ID. But since mgd_auth returns from a
well-defined set of IDs, this Should Never Happen (famous last words).
Emile
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> 'The joy of my life is in Zion - Lauryn Hill'
> Armand A. Verstappen * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
