Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > Well, this one may actually be our fault. But don't dispair, we have
> > crashed into other non-compatible changes between 4.0.4pl1 and 4.0.5
> > (and again to 4.0.6, I think). That were reported. And ignored. Oh,
> > and one that wasn't ignored entirely, just labelled 'bogus', removed
> > fro their bugtracking system with the comment to discuss it on their
> > list first (twice), and *then* ignored.
>
> Week later after 4.0.6 release we could synchronize our CVS with it and set
> up 4.0.6 as 'supported version'.
That ignores the fact that a lot of people don't upgrade the
second 4.0.6 will be out. And the request-config bug is still present.
Emile
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
