Hello Piotras,

> User from SG2 can not modify topics from SG1.
> and putting user form SG2 to SG1 and some group
> for modifying selected topics , causing other topics visible for him.
>
I read the discussion about sitegroups and compared with my application
on http://insight.kn-bremen.de . Maybe my example helps. There are two
sitegroups one for a linux user group  (isengard) and one for my family
(heine). Both groups have nothing in common. The Linux User groups keeps
nerds (like me) and my family with mom and dad are quite the opposite
:-)

So neither will my fellows read private articles inside my family nor
should my family ever be confused by technical articles. This was the
right time for  sitegroups. Its fine to log in  by dieter+isengard and
dieter+heine where my prename points to completely different persons. Of
course on prof. webservers are the most effective examples.. But it also
even works to simply freeze  different versions of private sites (by
repligard)

Yes, sitegroup management means a little bit more work. My sitegroups
have been build from scratch. Migration was not explicetly necessary.
But I had to do the same work with my current site because I transferred
the complete asgard structures (pages, styles + snippets) to another
sitegroup. Also, creation of sitegroups is a bit circumstantial. In
asgard I have to log in three times. The sitegroup admin group had to be
created first by admin+sitegroup. Then admin (root/asgard/SG0) had to
connect this new group to the new sitegroup afterwards. Finally another
relogin with admin+sitegroup started the new sitegroup.

When I read your questions and statements  about sitegroups I felt that
you rather want to share data than to seperate it. This should be done
by different hosts inside one sitegroup. The final question maybe
whether sitegroups still make sense with a minimum of groups, persons,
pages and its content. I think so, because  SG0 is something like the
root sitegroup. Every kind of application or customer should have a
sitegroup different to SG0 on some kind of user level. If you get used
to sitegroups you will  work 99% inside your favourite sitegroup and
won't need or  miss SG0. Of course until you need to login into SG0
again for creating another new sitegroup. However it's the best way to
keep calm when some people share administration and therefor have rights
to do some harm to your site.

If you still have questions about sitegroups feel free to ask any time
...

dieter





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to