> Just to satisfy my curiousity: why would you want to map > topics/articles to pages? If you want meaningful urls, why not have > the content in the pages themselves?
It's not about having meaningful URL's, it's more about breaking the dependency of hardcoding the Topic ID or Name in the Page code. Now my pages are all empty, because I do the Topic to page name matching in the Style, and it's nice and clean. As for putting content in the pages -- yes, this is how I did things when I was first learning Midgard, but I find that the Topic/Article mechanism is much more powerful, and easier for our users to understand. Plus it helps to enforce the paradigm that separates the code from the content, which I think is a worthy goal. cheers Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
