On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:29:31PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > > how hard would it be to make this extra function? > > > > Not hard at all. If you could cross-check with Alexander to make sure > > that it doesn't conflict with his plans for the scripting stuff, I can > > implement it. > In case of Scriptor this doesn't conflict with anything since it is > mostly same as functions for calendar handling. But it also rises another > question: do we need same function for _approved_, _revised_, and > _approved_ fields? Wouldn't it be better to have one function which This had to be _created_, _revised_, and _approved_ actually.
-- / Alexander Bokovoy $ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.` --- Love IS what it's cracked up to be. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
