> > There should be some check if an object can be shared, > > for example two hosts which has different or similiar content > > and want to share images. > > Shared between sitegroups, you mean? As I said, sitegroups were > designed to prevent just that. A better access control mechanism (one > that includes read permissions) would be a better approach, I think. > > > This way someone can prepare site templates for example. > > Or persons who are managing more than one host. > > Persons that manage more than one host can either put both hosts in > one sitegroup, or have multiple logons (even have the same > username/pass in both sitegroups). >
Yes, You're right , but I think that my case shows that , I cannot make things like You said. I _need_ have two SG and two hosts , but I want share just one topics' object. I cannot make it just with goups within one SG. There should be something like SG0, but very modified. Look SG0 is now useless. It is because it is. What custom user may do with it? Nothing I think. Sharing SG is like read access in groups within one SG , for me. Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
