> Right. The bremgard_page_walk is defined in a snippet? > /Bremgard/Functions/guard is some kind of /Asgard/Functions/basic for Bremgard .
> You could test like $code = mgd_snippet($path). If the returned string is > empty it couldn't find the snippet. > > It was empty for an hour this morning. After I switched authentication ON for the host (!) I bridged this critical pitfall of Bremgard. I should have know better since it belongs to the requirements of my site (and maybe all others). Without authentication $midgard->user is missing for most purposes in Bremgard that is a consequent followup for Asgard. However I would have never betted that out of all victims snippet inclusion is the first one. Maybe it's still a bug in midgard ? > > 1:1 backup of the target database should not be required because it > > would be rebuild by using the former sitegroup. Although there are many > > It should not be required, no, but it's usually a good idea to keep > pre-import backups. > There is a stupid proverb in german that says "only the fearfull have to back up on every step they take" (Wer bremst - using brakes - hat Angst) ;-) Beeing serious again I never used full exports but instead I have a list of 6 xml-files in a rwo that seperate asgard from bremgard fixes and also tracks some major bremgard releases. The reason for the dispense in this case should be clear because the import should be possible for any other site from scratch. On the other hand I also would have or even still should better restart from scratch. However a full restore into SG0 requires different privileges. But many problems could already have been avoided if I packed the sitegroup with all its content. However the seperation was intended at this moment because I don't know if sitegroups identity (not id) also is autoincremented or created dynamicly enough (?) Due to the sitegroup link problem maybe the import between sitegroups of two midgards failed just because of this my intention :-( (I'm afraid Alexander will tell me just this) > I downloaded the two files, and after changing the username & password > bremgard imported without comment into my database. How should I access > Bremgard? > Since you may havn't prepared a sitegroup it's part of your SG0 ? ( I never tested this variant) If you add an authenticated host to the root "Guild" with Bremgard style the call should show fragments. To see more fragments you will have to adjust 5 parameters in the first 10 lines of code-global. Until now they have to be inserted manually by reading the topic-ids from the top of the topic list. I prepared a longer first instruction that you may receive if you are interested. However you will see the same now under http://insight.kn-bremen.de:8080/Guild Unfortunately the first steps are not self explaining, still. However you may have take a look by entering with the guest user or even with the account from your repligard.conf. Since I forgot to remove it by accidence I removed it this morning ;-( If the import works the result is a site that combines 99% of asgard with the combined trees of pages and topics. Also, person+user adding by asgard callbacks with new sub-homepages by templated almost works :-) Mostly missing from my point of view is the pagelink admin in asgard that combines asgards pages with bremgards styles. > I really can't answer these questions, sorry. I know what sitegroups does but > very little of how repligard handles them. Alexander, please step in, I'm way > out of my depth here. > > I'm also rather interested because I have some clear associations now. E.g. since all groups+persons have been stranded in SG0 there is almost less then little hope that importing into a sitegroup guarantees sitegroups integrity. If my sitegroup borders would have been secure by the login given in repligard.conf I would not have to remove now all groups and persons from SG0. And this could only happen after I removed all sitegroup references from the xml by myself. Maybe I will start all over again with two xml files: First one loads the new sitegroup with root and admin person under SG0 in order to accept the body of the sitegroup. Ain't it so, Alexander ? dieter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
