On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:45:27PM +0200, Heine, Dieter wrote: > > > > The sitegroup could be exported and reimported without problems. > > The end of this thread is marked by successfully importing both files in > order to migrate tables between different midgard systems. Migrating > between sitegroups may be more complicated. > > The problems importing one sitegroup's head has also not ended > completely. Though only the sitegroup record was addressed the gz file > sized up to 18 KB. The overhead might come from dependencies. But on > reimporting it happens that all sitegroup's heads also have been > importet and therefor exported from the source midgard. Can you describe what you have meant by 'head'? Sorry, you are constantly selecting new words and making terminology understanding more like 'Who wants to be a millionaire' game. :)
> Is it not possible to select a single sitegroup ? It is possible and surely it works. The only limitation is that resources from SG0 can also leak into export file due dependencies. I'm thinking about making an option to stick to select SG only even if it would lead to loss of references against SG0 in some cases. -- / Alexander Bokovoy $ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.` --- You too can wear a nose mitten. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
