On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Anders Sjolander wrote:
>
> > There are other people who also like Asgard. Unfortunately,
> > neither David
> > nor me who were involved in Asgard development at Aurora's
> > time past year
> > now have time to develop it. I shall gladly accept patches
> > and extensions
> > to Asgard if you will make them and Asgard still be one of
> > official admin
> > interfaces for Midgard 1.4.
>
> Maybe I will, I'll probably have plenty of spare time this spring. Does
> anybody know what makes Asgard so incompatible with Nadmin? We figured
> it had something to do with Nadmin's publishing system (I don't know if
> there are issues if you use Nadmin without staging/publishing). I think
> it would be really nice to be able to develop sites in Asgard but let
> customers and content providers use Nadmin, since that's a bit more
> friendly.
>
> I don't know if this is stepping on someones toes but would it be
> possible to include support for Nadmin's staging/publishing features in
> Asgard?
It is impossible to do so as is due licensing difference. Asgard is under
GPL and Nadmin's license is more restrictive than GPL. Alternative
implementation of course could be solution.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
$ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature
`Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.`
---
Nov 21 20:58:58 alconost kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount.
Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
