Hello, pp wrote: > OK. I am a user and created account on midgard based site. > I create my preferences , account login etc. > The simplest way is to use preferences table for person. > But personally I need more. > I create person's topic. And then subtopics and articles and so on. > For example I want to have "my favourite folder" and store there , > news or forum threads. So I create subtopic "favourite" and articles > within it. Got it? > Next I may use all article and topic functions to watch and show and > manage all my personal issues.
Ok, this is clear now. Well, it is a good idea. I just have a bad feeling to put everything in midgard what are not related. Moreover, there will be about 5-20 parameters for each of articles (and there will be tens of thousands of articles), and there are thousands of persons, with similar number of params I suppose. I wonder what performance will give the system if there are, say, a million rows in parameters table? So, if I have the possibility to get out part of the data, I will utilize it. > > It doesn't help, anyway, as there is no midgard support for > > authentication for viewing pages. > > So? > For example create active pages and use all argv[] depending > on who is logged and what group he belongs. Simple? It is a solution if you are the content author. If there are another companies who write the pages (say, an extended way of webhosting), there is no way to use active pages for ordinary pages. I think is is not much more work to implement a new user database than work with mgd_auth_midgard etc. Instead of argv[] I can use the actual URL. Even I can throw back a 401 Authentication Required response if I want to log in the user. Fery --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
