> > > > > You can not manage members and groups within SG0 for example. > > > I don't get the point: I managed to create several users (at the topmost > > > level). > > > You mean person? Or member? > > Yes persons. I managed to create in SG0 several "persons". But they don't > seem to be members of groups. They just stand alone at the same level as > "Midgard Administrator". > When I try to select a "person" in the "member" select box, I get the > message "Cannot create Member[4]: Access denied"
That's why I wrote , that You shouldn't use SG0 :) SG0 is transparent and readable for everybody. So If You create some hosts with SG0 and then some hosts within SGx, users form SGx will able to read Your SG0 hosts. If You want Your sites be nor readable create them in another SG. SG0 is something what Al Pacino said to Keanu Reeves: "See but do not touch. Touch but do not taste" That's why Keanu prefered not to be in SG0 and shooted himself ;) > I am not talking about SGx's "persons" bein able to log in SG0, but I am > talking about SG0's "persons" bein able to log into SG0. Is it supposed to > be that way? See Emiliano post. > > AFAIR Asgard has a bug informing about login possibilities. > > What does "AFAIR" mean?? As Far As I Remember. Piotras BTW when new Asgard interface will be ready? I remember I had also big proplems with SG features using existing Asgard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
