Francois Dumais wrote: > Thanks, but what I wanted was a synthesis of where to put what and how would > what be interpreted in where and under what conditions. That's why I listed > every form field so that it would be easy for a replyer to just put his > comments besides the fields and say, for example: > "HTML there yes" > "No php here" > "only midgard here", etc... > > Therefore, again : > > Topic > -> Name (HTML?, Code?, Text? <[page/style element]>?) > -> Description (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Extra (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Code (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > > Article > -> Extra1 (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Extra2 (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Extra3 (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Abstract (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > -> Content (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > > Page > -> Content (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page/style element]>?) > > Page Element > ->Content (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[page element]>?) > > Style Element > ->Content (HTML?, Code?, Text?<[style element]>?)
Yes to all. You can include stuff in several ways from several sources, and all of the above are achieveable. _In general_, though, you'll have <[stuff]> (page and/or style element everywhere) in style or page records, and text and/or html in the others. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
