Torben Nehmer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > While working on MidCOM here, we stumbled on a simple problem: > > Theoretically the namespace conventions of MidCOM bring you an > worldwide, unique tree of elements that could be replicated without > problems. > > In reality this brings a big administrative overhead: Each SnippetDir > used globally has to have the same GUID. Pratically this is at least > difficult to enforce that everyone works with the same structure. Not > only we need to bring a standarized Top Level Snippet-Colletion with us > (for .com,.net,.com,.org and for about 180 other TLDs of different > Countries, not to mention the Sub-TLDs like .co.uk or .ac.uk...). While > this could be done, the problem continues if you imagine a larger > company, that uses multiple developement servers which should work in > the same domain. > > I'm not sure what to do here. It seems to me that we'd need a > customized Packaging system for MidCOM Packages which does not rely on > repligard to move MidCOMS around. Multiple discussions seem interesting > here: > > 1. Filebased Storage for distribution > 2. APT Like packaging, working entierely without repligard > 3. Using repligard with an wrapper script that can correctly handle > MidCOM Elements by name, and not by GUID. > > Personally I'd prefer (2), because it will give the most flexibility... > > > What do you think? > > > Live long and prosper! > Torben Nehmer > > - -- > Torben Nehmer, Munich, Germany > http://www.nathan-syntronics.de, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > PGP Public Key ID on wwwkeys.(de.)pgp.net: 0x7E9DE456 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE8tDiIJPh4Kn6d5FYRAnKJAKCq5RvMQ1UH2kSAKs297GS4eBSJsACfWoaD > 38yABESIJwYOIOa44uSRjpY= > =WhVj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
i am not sure if i understand. how do you plan to work without repligard (use sql?) i think (3) would be far the easiest solution. could also be combined with APT or any other packager. cheers david -- David Schmitter, CMS Developer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dataflow AG, Waaghaus-Passage 8, 3011 Bern, Switzerland http://www.dataflow.ch/, phone +41 848 000 102, fax +41 848 000 103 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
