> If this is correct, does this mean that I really am supposed to > use Articles and topics instead of pages when I build a site. The > content of most of the "web pages" are static so I thought that I > was supposed to use pages for such content (wich also mean that i > get a path and a title automagically). But if the access control > is such that one have to be a administrator to edit the pages > then pages seems unsuitable even for static content. Articles > seems to require some hacking to provide such for "web pages" > essential things as a path, ie a uri etc...
Think different. Indeed pages do not support group ownership but You may treet pages as "executables" files. You may set pages to active that way to bring to them all important data with urls. Make topics and articles available for particular groups and persons and then create sites with pages code and article/topic contents. Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
