Take a look at the CVS solution by dataflow. TH On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:28, Vincent wrote: > pp wrote: > > Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hello, > >>I was wondering if anyone has looked into using mysql's db replication > >>feature as an alternative means of staging a midgard site. What I was > >>thinking having the "live" midgard db acting as a slave database server > >>to the development one. Manual updates could be done with > >>SLAVE START|STOP commands on the mysql slave server. > > > > > > This will replicate all DB , while repligard may replicate some part of DB. > > > > > > actually you can limit replication to a database or table in mysql 4.0x > with the following options. > > replicate-do-table=db_name.table_name # limit to table(s) > replicate-do-db=database_name # limit to database(s) > > > > > > >>The only problem > >>would be blob files > > > > maybe these could be handled with an rsync? > > > > > That's why repligard is good :) > > > > > >>and the cache (if used). > > > > > > It is not repligard related. Well..... using MASTER|SLAVE feature > > for cache table will make Your site very unstable IMHO. > > > > > I'm still not convinced it's crazy yet. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
