On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 00:47, hdcastro wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. We're in the process of reviewing openpsa, > however, at first glance it looks fairly simple compared with more > robust gpl options like xrms, sugarcrm or others. That's a point. But, please tell us what is missing :-)
> If anyone else has any ideas or can suggest a reasonable work around > that addresses the include systems. ((Midgard has only one system of > includes while php has a number of them. Php has conditional > includes and Midgard does not. Then there is the issue of having > seperate user authentication systems and seperate user databases. The > best thing is to have one system. One username and one password. Its > better for the user. ?? Midgard 1.6 supports PAM so this should be fairly straight forward easy to do. (Ok, now we got pam, what I'm missing now is the opportunity to have Apache handle authentication - but that may wait =) When it comes to includes I have to agree with you. A some developers are also moving in the direction of using files instead of snippets. This shouldn't be hard to integrate with normal replicationsystems and I think it might provide some speedbenefits. > Is there a work around to accomplish these things, and if so, what do > we need to do? Otherwise We'll actually have to code it into midgard > and write all the sql queries and essentially build a complete crm > application from scratch)) Then I quess OpenPSA is a better start :) But: what are your integration needs? If you got a costumer db, think of how to link it to midgard w/o having to integrate the whole application. Maybe pam_mysql + som nasty code to sync users is all you need. PS: Indy implemented a Midgard-SOAP interface that might be usefull to you. Tarjei > > Thanks > > Chris > > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eero af Heurlin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > hdcastro wrote: > > | 1. Are there significant improvements since 1.4 to justify the > hassle > > | of updating to the newest version? Can anyone point out some of > the > > | biggest improvements so we can evaluate if we should bother to > > | update? Also, if we update, is there a way we can do it easily and > > | seamlessly? > > | > > > > 1.4 to 1.5 upgrade should not give any hassles at all, though not > much > > in the way of features either. 1.6 [still in beta] has lots more > > features (some of the more exotic patches have been included to the > > main tree and turned on by default), I'd not rush to be the first > one to > > try the migration out unless I had a proper testing environment > > (separate but identical installation). > > > > | > > | 2. Most importantly, we would like to integrate a crm/contact > mgmnt > > | system like xrms (http://xrms.sourceforge.net/)into midgard that > > | would allow us to develop an asp (application service provider) > > | product with multiple modules. However, the problem with bringing > an > > | > > > > I suggest checking out openpsa (www.openpsa.org) it's already > Midgard > > integrated. > > > > /Rambo > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows 2000) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQFBAp6Di7iLtQbxbW8RAmYPAKCZRZu8+ddhzlW6s82MhYloZYaMawCgqFuY > > iUGGS7vLamDb7p+sqJ5imgQ= > > =MxTp > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
