fre, 06,.05.2005 kl. 17.23 +0200, skrev Marcin Soltysiak:
> From: "Henri Bergius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Tarjei Huse wrote:
> >> 2. Make a new "base content" component that handles topics that have noe
> >> defined component (for migration of existing data).
> > 
> > Or how about making a content migration wizard based on my nnb2midcom
> > script?
> > http://www.nehmer.net/~bergie/nnb2midcom.txt
> > 
> > Especially if people are used Tony's index article enabled Aegir
> > Sample Site, the data format is very close and you can keep
> > both MidCOMized and the old Aegir-style site running side-by-side.
> 
> How about sites driven by proprietary applications? I got dozens such sites 
> from pre-MidCOM epoch.

My plan is that this issue should be tackled in not one but a few ways:

1. Use OB as bergie suggested 
This is the first stage, lets the app work as it has always done.

2. Have a simple php midcom. 
I.e. a midcom that lets a new developer create a simple page in midcom
(say a form) and display it without knowing any midcom internals.

This is for that quick-and-ready app you needed yesterday. Also it lets
new people start a bit slowly.

(I'm not sure if I can a difference between this one and number 1 - but
it is there)  .

3. Develop good MidComs for the most used situations:
-> A midcom that better handles taviewer/newsticker situations w/o
resorting to stylehacks.
-> a quickform midcom for that form you just need (it's comming allong).


That should cover most situations. 
Tarjei
> 
> Solt
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
-- 
Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to