Thanks Stephen. Pretty sure it's not a timeout. I agree that tests should be able to be run any number of times. And in fact "mvn clean test test test test" works fine. It's "mvn cobertura:cobertura" which doesn't - and that only runs tests once. Justin
________________________________ From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 9/25/2008 3:09 AM To: user@mojo.codehaus.org Subject: Re: [mojo-user] test pass normally, but fail under cobertura I have seen tests fail under cobertura when: 1. Tests have timeouts 2. Tests make incorrect assumptions about how the JVM memory model and synchronization work (or don't) This second one is why I always say run your tests twice ;-) 2008/9/25 Edelson, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've been struggling for the past 2 days with a set of Spring-based integration tests that pass when run normally (i.e. mvn test), but fail when run using the cobertura plugin. I recognize this is a shot in the dark, but if anyone has any ideas on things I can try, I'd appreciate it. Specifically, I'd be interested in any differences in the classpath between a normal test run and the cobertura test run. Thanks, Justin
