For others benefit, here is how I have my pom (see lines in bold font for relevant config): <build> <outputDirectory>target/hosted/WEB-INF/classes</outputDirectory> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>gwt-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.1-SNAPSHOT</version> <configuration> <output>${basedir}/target/hosted</output> <module>com.test.CalendarApp</module> <runTarget>com.test.CalendarApp/Calendar.html</runTarget> </configuration> <executions> <execution> <goals> <goal>compile</goal> <goal>test</goal> </goals> </execution> </executions> </plugin> ... <plugins> ... <build> It seems to me that writing generated output in the src tree (rather than the target tree) is not good maven practice. I do not know enough of the issues involved but I feel we should change the default for the plugin to be a directory under target tree and still have normal behavior. What do you and others think of changing the defaults to something like what I show above in bold? Thanks. nicolas de loof wrote:
-- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
- [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + noserver option Christophe Lombart
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + noserver option nicolas de loof
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + noserver opt... Christophe Lombart
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + noserver opt... Farrukh Najmi
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + noserver... nicolas de loof
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + nose... nicolas de loof
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 +... Farrukh Najmi
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1... nicolas de loof
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 + nose... Farrukh Najmi
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 +... Nathaniel Auvil
- Re: [mojo-user] Maven + GWT 1.6 +... Christophe Lombart
- [mojo-user] Re: Issue: Generated ... Farrukh Najmi