> So things like NUTCH-666 should be ported to SOLR to use on Nutch 2.0? > ok. problem is some things like NUTCH-666 are required both on indexing > and >
definitely on the SOLR side from now on > btw,when Nutch 2.0 is planned to be released?1.1 took several years... > we are still at a very early design / testing stage but I think the plan would be to have something up and running before 2011. You can of course make it happen sooner by contributing to its discussion / development / testing / documentation. Nutch 2.0 is very likely to be based on http://github.com/dogacan/nutchbase which is already working for most parts. There is also a list of features for 2.0 on http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Nutch2Roadmap which everybody is welcome to contribute to J. > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > Julien > > > > > > > > -- > > > > DigitalPebble Ltd > > > > > > > > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > > > > > > > > On 23 June 2010 11:36, Dmitriy V. Kazimirov > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible (likely not but still) to make Nutch use different > > > > values > > > > > of fetcher.threads.per.host for different domains? > > > > > > > > > > i.e. low default value(1-3) and for domains which I _knew_ can > > handle > > > > load > > > > > and it won't be problem - increase it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If that's not possible could someone give advice where in code to > > > > look to > > > > > make such modifications? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With regards, Dmitriy Kazimirov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > DigitalPebble Ltd > > > > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > -- DigitalPebble Ltd Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://www.digitalpebble.com
