On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gabriele Kahlout
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:36 PM, McGibbney, Lewis John <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gabriele,
>>
>> Out of curiosity, how large is your crawl job? How many URL's are you
>> fetching on each increment. Is it a continuous crawl job?
>>
>
> I guess the -topN 1 triggered your interest. I was fetching only one local
> page out of testing. Now I'm testing to crawl simple wikipedia with -topN
> 100. I'm also trying to figure out wherether my $3 represents the depth of
> crawls or not.
> It's for sure if all the urls <= -topN, but when doing what I'm trying
> (incremental crawling) I'd like all urls injected to be fetched, in topN
> increments, rather than start fetch urls found in the previous iteration
> topN urls.
>

It indeed is this way. I'guess my options would be:

1. use a scoring plugin that assigns a lower score to links that the initial
score, so that urls from the urls list are retrieved first using -topN than
links added to the db after fetching. My understanding is that the
OpicScoringFilter right now assigns 0 to start with and so all urls are
equal and the hashtable works more like a LIFO, hence links are crawled
before urls in the list.

2. Include inject in the loop and have the size of the urls in the file ==
topN such that one iteration is enough for all urls and then inject again.
Once the whole list is therefore fetched (with depth=0) one can iterate for
depth if desired. I guess this solution is aka merging crawls.

I'll be tryin 2. Meanwhile I've changed the script to the attached.


>
>
>>
>> Lewis
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Gabriele Kahlout [[email protected]]
>> Sent: 24 March 2011 12:30
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; Claudio Martella; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Index while crawling
>>
>> This seems to work.
>>
>> i=0
>> while true;
>> do
>>    if [[ $i -ge $3 ]]
>>
>> Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number
>> SC021474
>>
>> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Widening Participation Initiative of the
>> Year 2009 and Herald Society’s Education Initiative of the Year 2009.
>>
>> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,6219,en.html
>>
>> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Outstanding Support for Early Career
>> Researchers of the Year 2010, GCU as a lead with Universities Scotland
>> partners.
>>
>> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,15691,en.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> K. Gabriele
>
> --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧
> time(x) < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
>
> If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
> does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
> starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
> L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
>
>


-- 
Regards,
K. Gabriele

--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).

If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).

Reply via email to