> > I need to crawl 100K urls everyday. I have separate process
which produces
>
> the urls for me, but it is a bit time taking process. I do not want to
wait
> for all the urls to be generated and then start the nutch crawl. What i
> want is to start the nutch fetch process whenever I have received a batch
> of urls (say 10K) available. Is it possible to inject the batch2 of 10K
> urls while fetch for batch1 is still running? If yes, when will nutch pick
> the next batch for crawl.

markus: This is only possible when you use the freegen command. Also, i'd
not
recommend running concurrent jobs in local mode.


puneetp: I am planning to run the jobs using hadoop cluster. Suppose I am
running two concurrent fetch jobs will politeness be taken care of across
the jobs ??

Also, is it possible to set up a pipeline where i just keep injecting urls
(say in batches of 10K) and generator/freegen/"something else" keeps
feeding it to the fetcher respecting all the politeness??

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > my questions/doubts are inline
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Puneet,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Puneet Pandey <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > I have started using nutch recently.
> > > > As I understand nutch crawling is a cyclic process
> > > > inject->generate->fetch->parse->update
> > >
> > > Yes this is typically what you would execute.
> > >
> > > > 1. When does parse start when I use the "crawl" command line. Is it
> > > > after all the urls have been fetched in the segment?
> > >
> > > Depends on what settings you specify in nutch-site.xml, by default
> > > parsing is done as a separate process (after fetching) when using the
> > > crawl command.
> >
> > Suppose i submitted 10K urls in a segment for crawl. Does the parsing of
> > the content start as soon as the first URL is available (i.e. fetched) or
> > the parsing starts only after all 10K have been fetched. For my use case
> i
> > want parsing to start on the urls as soon as they are available w/o
> waiting
> > for fetch on others to complete.
>
> don't use the crawl command, it has fetchign and parsing as separate jobs.
> You
> need to enable fetcher.parse to parse fetched files immediately.
>
> >
> > > > What if I want to the parse
> > > > the content as soon as it has been fetched?
> > >
> > > Change your settings in nutch-site.xml to override the defaults, then
> > > rebuild the project.
> > >
> > > > 2. Is it possible to run two fetches in parallel? Suppose I generate
> 2
> > > > segments is it possible to run fetch on seg1 and seg2 in parallel?
> > >
> > > Yes this is possible, you would set the number of threads in your
> fetcher
> > > to run this task in parallel.
> > >
> > > I need to crawl 100K urls everyday. I have separate process which
> > > produces
> >
> > the urls for me, but it is a bit time taking process. I do not want to
> wait
> > for all the urls to be generated and then start the nutch crawl. What i
> > want is to start the nutch fetch process whenever I have received a batch
> > of urls (say 10K) available. Is it possible to inject the batch2 of 10K
> > urls while fetch for batch1 is still running? If yes, when will nutch
> pick
> > the next batch for crawl.
>
> This is only possible when you use the freegen command. Also, i'd not
> recommend running concurrent jobs in local mode.
>
> >
> > Also, I do not want to crawl any of the links from the fetched pages. The
> > only urls that need to be crawled are the ones generated by my process.
> How
> > do i ensure this. Is there any config setting with which we can disable
> > crawl of links present in fetched pages?
>
> Update the crawldb with additions disabled.
>
> >
> > > > 3. Can I limit the number of urls per host per segment in the
> generate
> > >
> > > step
> > >
> > > > itself?
> > >
> > > Yes, please check out nutch-default.xml for generator properties, I
> don't
> > > have the settings off my head but this is possible.
> > >
> > > > Puneet
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
>

Reply via email to