Hi Alex,

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In 1.X version there are -noAdditions options to updatedb  and  -adddays 
> option to generate commands. How something similar to them can be done in 2.X 
> version?

Yeah I suppose that this functionality could be added to Nutch 2.0, if
you are after it please feel free to open a ticket and we can begin
looking into it...

>
> Here, http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Nutch2Roadmap it is stated

I am sorry to admit this but reading/scanning/quoting content from
within this page should be taken with a pinch of salt. I am not
entirely sure that it portrays a wholly accurate and true reflection
of where Nutch 2.X is going... the development team and the codebase
has had to adapt to dynamically changing conditions over the last
while.

> "Modify code so that parser can generate multiple documents which is what 1.x 
> does but not 2.0"
> It is my understanding that 1.X's parser does not create multiple documents, 
> though. Then what is the meaning of the above statement?

I really don't know... I'm hoping someone else could drop in on this
one and provide a bit of insight. I am also not familiar with the
concept of parsring implementations creating multiple documents out of
the box.

>
> Thanks.
> Alex.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>
> To: user <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 6:09 am
> Subject: Re: nutch-2.0 updatedb and parse commands
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:11 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems to me that all options to updatedb command that nutch 1.4 has, have
> been removed in nutch-2.0. I would like to know if this was done purposefully 
> or
> they will be added later?
>
> As you have noticed there are a number of differences between 1.X and 2.X.
>
> W.r.t the ones you highlight e.g. CLI, yes these are intended
>
>> Also, how can I create multiple doc using parse command?
>
> Can you please elaborate slightly?
>
>> It seem there is no >sufficient arguments to parse command too.
>
> What would you like to see added? If you feel like adding
> functionality then please open a ticket and if possible submit a patch
> if you have time. I've been working with the parsing code and it works
> fine for me but I don't fully understand your comment so if you again
> could elaborate if would be excellent.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lewis
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Alex.
>
>
>
> --
> Lewis
>
>



-- 
Lewis

Reply via email to