Hi Chris, Excellent news. I can only assume that there is a compatibility issue with your RedHat box and 2.1!
Please see our 2.x tutorials below http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/#Nutch_2.X_tutorial.28s.29 There are currently quite a few options for storing your webdb or hostdb crawl data. Any questions, please get back on list. hth Lewis On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christopher Gross <[email protected]> wrote: > I was able to get it built on my windows box, then I moved that to my > linux box. Now I'm trying to run it, but getting other errors (wants > me to configure a DB). > > Is there a more thorough setup guide for Nutch 2.1 somewhere? I was > able to work with 1.4 more or less out of the box (some minor > configuration needed), but 2.1 seems to be a completely different > beast. > > -- Chris > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Christopher Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >> I get that same error for 2.1 as well, FYI. >> >> -- Chris >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Christopher Gross <[email protected]> wrote: >>> OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.8 (Tikanga) >>> java version "1.6.0_30" >>> Apache Ant version 1.7.0 compiled on December 13 2006 >>> >>> OK, I'm not going to be going live with a 2.x version of Nutch anytime >>> soon, I just wanted to make sure that when I'm ready to deploy it'll >>> be a full release, so if you're really pushing for 2.1 to be out soon, >>> then that's what I'll work with. >>> >>> -- Chris >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Christopher Gross <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I moved it to a different directory, same errors. >>>> >>>> Mmm. I'm stumped here. What OS as you on? >>>>> >>>>> I'll try 2.1 and see if that works any better. >>>> >>>> Please do and get back to us with your results as we are currently >>>> trying to build proof of concept before closing the RC. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you have an idea when 2.1 will go from a release candidate to a >>>>> full release? A ballpark is OK. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I suspect (further to more in depth testing from some more committers >>>> and community members) I would like to see it released in the next few >>>> days. >>>> >>>> Lewis -- Lewis
