Hi Kiran,

there are many possible reasons for the problem. Beside the limits on the 
number of processes
the stack size in the Java VM and the system (see java -Xss and ulimit -s).

I think in local mode there should be only one mapper and consequently only
one thread spent for parsing. So the number of processes/threads is hardly the
problem suggested that you don't run any other number crunching tasks in 
parallel
on your desktop.

Luckily, you should be able to retry via "bin/nutch parse ..."
Then trace the system and the Java process to catch the reason.

Sebastian

On 03/02/2013 08:13 PM, kiran chitturi wrote:
> Sorry, i am looking to crawl 400k documents with the crawl. I said 400 in
> my last message.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:12 PM, kiran chitturi 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am running Nutch 1.6 on a 4 GB Mac OS desktop with Core i5 2.8GHz.
>>
>> Last night i started a crawl on local mode for 5 seeds with the config
>> given below. If the crawl goes well, it should fetch a total of 400
>> documents. The crawling is done on a single host that we own.
>>
>> Config
>> ---------------------
>>
>> fetcher.threads.per.queue - 2
>> fetcher.server.delay - 1
>> fetcher.throughput.threshold.pages - -1
>>
>> crawl script settings
>> ----------------------------
>> timeLimitFetch- 30
>> numThreads - 5
>> topN - 10000
>> mapred.child.java.opts=-Xmx1000m
>>
>>
>> I have noticed today that the crawl has stopped due to an error and i have
>> found the below error in logs.
>>
>> 2013-03-01 21:45:03,767 INFO  parse.ParseSegment - Parsed (0ms):
>>> http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JARS/v33n3/v33n3-letcher.htm
>>> 2013-03-01 21:45:03,790 WARN  mapred.LocalJobRunner - job_local_0001
>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
>>>         at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)
>>>         at java.lang.Thread.start(Thread.java:658)
>>>         at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addThread(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:681)
>>>         at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.addIfUnderMaximumPoolSize(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:727)
>>>         at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.execute(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:655)
>>>         at
>>> java.util.concurrent.AbstractExecutorService.submit(AbstractExecutorService.java:92)
>>>         at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseUtil.runParser(ParseUtil.java:159)
>>>         at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseUtil.parse(ParseUtil.java:93)
>>>         at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseSegment.map(ParseSegment.java:97)
>>>         at org.apache.nutch.parse.ParseSegment.map(ParseSegment.java:44)
>>>         at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:50)
>>>         at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:436)
>>>         at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:372)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:212)
>>> (END)
>>
>>
>>
>> Did anyone run in to the same issue ? I am not sure why the new native
>> thread is not being created. The link here says [0] that it might due to
>> the limitation of number of processes in my OS. Will increase them solve
>> the issue ?
>>
>>
>> [0] - http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~czhang/errors.html
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Kiran Chitturi
>>
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to