> IMHO it's not that the developers *should* focus on this or that. I see it > more as an evolutionary process where things get improved because they are > used in the first place or get derelict and abandoned if there is no > interest from users. If as you say people prefer to have a SQL backend > instead of the sequential HDFS data structures then there will be more > contributions and as a result 2.x will be improved. > > Julien > Yes, This is a great point for Nutch 2.x. I think there a lot of potential users for SQL store in 2.x, since 2.x started supporting backends for Nutch. This was my initial idea when I started out but I settled with 1.6 at the end :)
> > -- > * > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > -- Kiran Chitturi <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiranchitturi>
