Hi John, No problem and thanks for your incredible responsiveness.
Recently updated the patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1475 to take into account Sebastien's recommendation. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12548141/index-more-2x.patch Thanks James ________________________________________ From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 7:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: tstamp and date field -- future dates??? Hi James, Can you please point us to the patch and we will try to get it in to the codebase? Thanks... and sorry if we didn't look into the patch yet. Lewis On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:29 AM, James Sullivan < [email protected]> wrote: > Please ignore this E-mail. It only happens in the specific case when the > web site being crawled does not set last modified in the header. I have > already submitted a patch for this specific case. > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:49 AM, James Sullivan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Is anybody else having an issue with future dates showing up in tstamp > and > > date fields in Solr with the more recent 2.x builds? > > > > This is a known issue NUTCH-1475< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1475> but > > it seemed to have been fixed for awhile without extra patching but has > > resurfaced some time in the last six months or so. Not a big deal as the > > work around is simple but I would be interested if there were changes in > > the fetchtime/tstamp area in that time frame. I am running a non stock > > Nutch (using adaptiveFetchschedule instead of default, etc.) so the > problem > > may well just be with my particular configuration > > > > > -- *Lewis*
