Done.







At 2013-08-08 10:40:19,"Lewis John Mcgibbney" <[email protected]> wrote:
>You don't need to commit, you only need to create a patch and attach it to
>the issue you open on Jira ;)
>Some like this
>* open an issue here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH
>* describe in as much detail what the issue is about and fill in all
>required fields to the best of your ability
>* make changes to your code. Best to do svn update so you are working with
>branches/2.x HEAD
>* create a patch - svn diff > ${ISSUE_NUMBER}.patch
>* attach the patch
>
>we will review and commit if it is OK.
>Thanks
>Lewis
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Rui Gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to do that, but it seems I don't have permission to commit
>> the code. Could someone give me the access? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Rui
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2013-08-08 10:30:21,"Lewis John Mcgibbney" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >Hi Rui,
>> >Please open a Jira for this and patch up 2.3-SNAPSHOT if you are able.
>> >You are right, it's probably about time to get ride of the class and entry
>> >within the bin/nutch script... or at atleast to log a HUGE WARN message
>> >when the class is invoked to say that it is deprecated and should not be
>> >used.
>> >
>> >
>> >On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Rui Gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In that case, I think we could remove the whole class Crawler to make
>> >> things clear.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> At 2013-08-07 01:05:19,"Sebastian Nagel" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >Hi Rui,
>> >> >
>> >> >yes,
>> >> >- depth (in deprecated class o.a.n.crawl.Crawler) and
>> >> >- numberOfRounds (in bin/crawl)
>> >> >mean the same.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sebastian
>> >> >
>> >> >On 08/06/2013 04:15 PM, Rui Gao wrote:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Before 2.1, I use parameter 'depth'. Do we still have such parameter
>> in
>> >> 2.2.1?    I see there is a parameter 'numberOfRounds', does it replace
>> the
>> >> parameter 'depth'?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Rui
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >*Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*

Reply via email to