It got robots denied when I ran a full crawl (ie. inject -> generate .. etc). Strange why RobotRulesParser gave opposite result. I am looking into this.
~tejas On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Markus Jelsma <[email protected]>wrote: > Can you try doing a simple crawl (freegen, fetch, parse, update) over 1 > record? > > This is my relevant config: > > <property> > <name>http.agent.name</name> > <value>Mozilla</value> > </property> > <property> > <name>http.agent.version</name> > <value>5.0</value> > </property> > <property> > <name>http.robots.agents</name> > <value>nutch</value> > </property> > <property> > <name>http.agent.description</name> > <value>compatible; NutchCrawler</value> > </property> > <property> > <name>http.agent.url</name> > <value>+http://example.org/</value> > </property> > > # cat /var/www/robots.txt > User-agent: * > Disallow: / > > User-agent: nutch > Allow: / > > markus@midas:~/projects/apache/nutch/trunk/runtime/local$ rm -r > crawl/crawldb/ ; ./run.sh ; bin/nutch readdb crawl/crawldb/ -url > http://localhost/ > FreeGenerator: starting at 2014-01-24 15:58:38 > FreeGenerator: finished at 2014-01-24 15:58:40, elapsed: 00:00:02 > Fetcher: Your 'http.agent.name' value should be listed first in > 'http.robots.agents' property. > Fetcher: starting at 2014-01-24 15:58:41 > Fetcher: segment: crawl/segments/20140124155839 > Fetcher Timelimit set for : 1390578521635 > Using queue mode : byHost > Fetcher: threads: 10 > Fetcher: time-out divisor: 4 > QueueFeeder finished: total 1 records + hit by time limit :0 > Using queue mode : byHost > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > fetching http://localhost/ (queue crawl delay=5000ms) > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Fetcher: throughput threshold: 1 > Fetcher: throughput threshold retries: 20 > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=0 > -activeThreads=0, spinWaiting=0, fetchQueues.totalSize=0 > -activeThreads=0 > Fetcher: finished at 2014-01-24 15:58:44, elapsed: 00:00:02 > CrawlDb update: starting at 2014-01-24 15:58:45 > CrawlDb update: db: crawl/crawldb > CrawlDb update: segments: [crawl/segments/20140124155839] > CrawlDb update: additions allowed: true > CrawlDb update: URL normalizing: false > CrawlDb update: URL filtering: false > CrawlDb update: 404 purging: false > CrawlDb update: Merging segment data into db. > CrawlDb update: finished at 2014-01-24 15:58:46, elapsed: 00:00:01 > URL: http://localhost/ > Version: 7 > Status: 3 (db_gone) > Fetch time: Mon Mar 10 15:58:42 CET 2014 > Modified time: Thu Jan 01 01:00:00 CET 1970 > Retries since fetch: 0 > Retry interval: 3888000 seconds (45 days) > Score: 0.0 > Signature: null > Metadata: > _pst_=robots_denied(18), lastModified=0 > > > > > Now, when i try again with robots reordered: > > # cat /var/www/robots.txt > User-agent: nutch > Allow: / > > User-agent: * > Disallow: / > > markus@midas:~/projects/apache/nutch/trunk/runtime/local$ rm -r > crawl/crawldb/ ; ./run.sh ; bin/nutch readdb crawl/crawldb/ -url > http://localhost/ > FreeGenerator: starting at 2014-01-24 16:17:41 > FreeGenerator: finished at 2014-01-24 16:17:44, elapsed: 00:00:02 > Fetcher: Your 'http.agent.name' value should be listed first in > 'http.robots.agents' property. > Fetcher: starting at 2014-01-24 16:17:45 > Fetcher: segment: crawl/segments/20140124161743 > Fetcher Timelimit set for : 1390579665184 > Using queue mode : byHost > Fetcher: threads: 10 > Fetcher: time-out divisor: 4 > QueueFeeder finished: total 1 records + hit by time limit :0 > Using queue mode : byHost > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > fetching http://localhost/ (queue crawl delay=5000ms) > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Using queue mode : byHost > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=1 > Fetcher: throughput threshold: 1 > Fetcher: throughput threshold retries: 20 > -finishing thread FetcherThread, activeThreads=0 > -activeThreads=0, spinWaiting=0, fetchQueues.totalSize=0 > -activeThreads=0 > Fetcher: finished at 2014-01-24 16:17:47, elapsed: 00:00:02 > CrawlDb update: starting at 2014-01-24 16:17:48 > CrawlDb update: db: crawl/crawldb > CrawlDb update: segments: [crawl/segments/20140124161743] > CrawlDb update: additions allowed: true > CrawlDb update: URL normalizing: false > CrawlDb update: URL filtering: false > CrawlDb update: 404 purging: false > CrawlDb update: Merging segment data into db. > CrawlDb update: finished at 2014-01-24 16:17:49, elapsed: 00:00:01 > URL: http://localhost/ > Version: 7 > Status: 2 (db_fetched) > Fetch time: Sun Feb 23 16:17:46 CET 2014 > Modified time: Fri Jan 24 16:17:46 CET 2014 > Retries since fetch: 0 > Retry interval: 2592000 seconds (30 days) > Score: 0.0 > Signature: 49d1ab51eb6b764c6aec12bcb17ebba0 > Metadata: > Content-Type=text/html > _pst_=success(1), lastModified=0 > _rs_=2 > > > > I tried putting this also in a unit test but that did not work, perhaps > the problem is not only in one component? > > Thanks > Markus > > > > -----Original message----- > > From:Tejas Patil <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday 24th January 2014 16:06 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Order of robots file > > > > With the current Nutch trunk, the scenario you described gets reproduced > > with multiple agents but not with single agent: > > > > $ cat robots.txt > > User-agent: * > > Disallow: / > > > > User-agent: nutch > > Allow: / > > > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > nutch,* > > not allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > nutch > > allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > > > You need not add additional "*" in the http.robots.agents string as CC > > would internally add it for you and smartly do a match with (User-agent: > *) > > when no agent names are matching with the rules from robots.txt > > > > Multiple agents without any "*" > > -------------------------------------------- > > As CC is greedy, it matched "nutch" and allowed in the first two examples > > below. In the last case, it correctly did mismatch. > > > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > foobar,nutch > > allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > nutch,foobar > > allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > foobar > > not allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > > > Multiple agents with "*" > > ----------------------------------- > > Bad result as it would match with "*" as soon as it scans the first rule > in > > the robots file. > > > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > foobar,nutch,* > > not allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > $ bin/nutch org.apache.nutch.protocol.RobotRulesParser robots.txt > urls.txt > > nutch,foobar,* > > not allowed: http://temp.com/index.html > > > > Thanks, > > Tejas > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Markus Jelsma > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > > > From:Tejas Patil <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Friday 24th January 2014 15:49 > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: Order of robots file > > > > > > > > I am working on the scenario you just pointed out. By Apache Nutch, > you > > > > mean the current codebase with CC or version before that ? > > > > > > No, this is current trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > CC differs from original nutch code as CC has kinda a greedy approach > > > > wherein it tries to get a match / mismatch after every line is sees > from > > > > the robots file. While the time I was working on delegation of robots > > > > parsing to Crawler commons (CC), I remember that there was > difference in > > > > the semantics of original parsing code and CC's implementation for > > > multiple > > > > robots agents. > > > > Here was my observation at that time: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1031?focusedCommentId=13558217&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13558217 > > > > > > The problem i describe persists with one and multiple robot agent > names. > > > So it is also a problem with: > > > <property> > > > <name>http.robots.agents</name> > > > <value>nutch</value> > > > </property> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~tejas > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Markus Jelsma > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Tejas, the problem exists in Apache Nutch as well. We'll take > > > localhost as > > > > > example and the following config and robots.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # cat /var/www/robots.txt > > > > > User-agent: * > > > > > Disallow: / > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: nutch > > > > > Allow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > config: > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>http.agent.name</name> > > > > > <value>Mozilla</value> > > > > > </property> > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>http.agent.version</name> > > > > > <value>5.0</value> > > > > > </property> > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>http.robots.agents</name> > > > > > <value>nutch,*</value> > > > > > </property> > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>http.agent.description</name> > > > > > <value>compatible; NutchCrawler</value> > > > > > </property> > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>http.agent.url</name> > > > > > <value>+http://example.org/</value> > > > > > </property> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > URL: http://localhost/ > > > > > Version: 7 > > > > > Status: 3 (db_gone) > > > > > Fetch time: Mon Mar 10 15:36:48 CET 2014 > > > > > Modified time: Thu Jan 01 01:00:00 CET 1970 > > > > > Retries since fetch: 0 > > > > > Retry interval: 3888000 seconds (45 days) > > > > > Score: 0.0 > > > > > Signature: null > > > > > Metadata: > > > > > _pst_=robots_denied(18), lastModified=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you confirm? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > > > > > From:Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sent: Friday 24th January 2014 15:29 > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: Order of robots file > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, sorry for being unclear. You understand correctly, i had to > > > change > > > > > the robots.txt order and put our crawler ABOVE User-Agent: *. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have tried a unit test for lib-http to demonstrate the problem > but > > > i > > > > > does not fail. I think i did something wrong in merging the code > base. > > > I'll > > > > > look further. > > > > > > > > > > > > markus@midas:~/projects/apache/nutch/trunk$ svn diff > > > > > > > > > src/plugin/lib-http/src/test/org/apache/nutch/protocol/http/api/TestRobotRulesParser.java > > > > > > Index: > > > > > > > > > src/plugin/lib-http/src/test/org/apache/nutch/protocol/http/api/TestRobotRulesParser.java > > > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > src/plugin/lib-http/src/test/org/apache/nutch/protocol/http/api/TestRobotRulesParser.java > > > > > (revision 1560984) > > > > > > +++ > > > > > > > > > src/plugin/lib-http/src/test/org/apache/nutch/protocol/http/api/TestRobotRulesParser.java > > > > > (working copy) > > > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,23 @@ > > > > > > + "" + CR > > > > > > + "User-Agent: *" + CR > > > > > > + "Disallow: /foo/bar/" + CR; // no crawl delay for > other > > > agents > > > > > > + > > > > > > + private static final String ROBOTS_STRING_REVERSE = > > > > > > + "User-Agent: *" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /foo/bar/" + CR // no crawl delay for other > > > agents > > > > > > + + "" + CR > > > > > > + + "User-Agent: Agent1 #foo" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /a" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /b/a" + CR > > > > > > + + "#Disallow: /c" + CR > > > > > > + + "Crawl-delay: 10" + CR // set crawl delay for Agent1 > as 10 > > > sec > > > > > > + + "" + CR > > > > > > + + "" + CR > > > > > > + + "User-Agent: Agent2" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /a/bloh" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /c" + CR > > > > > > + + "Disallow: /foo" + CR > > > > > > + + "Crawl-delay: 20" + CR; > > > > > > > > > > > > private static final String[] TEST_PATHS = new String[] { > > > > > > "http://example.com/a";, > > > > > > @@ -80,6 +97,29 @@ > > > > > > /** > > > > > > * Test that the robots rules are interpreted correctly by the > > > robots > > > > > rules parser. > > > > > > */ > > > > > > + public void testRobotsAgentReverse() { > > > > > > + rules = parser.parseRules("testRobotsAgent", > > > > > ROBOTS_STRING_REVERSE.getBytes(), CONTENT_TYPE, SINGLE_AGENT); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + for(int counter = 0; counter < TEST_PATHS.length; > counter++) { > > > > > > + assertTrue("testing on agent (" + SINGLE_AGENT + "), and " > > > > > > + + "path " + TEST_PATHS[counter] > > > > > > + + " got " + rules.isAllowed(TEST_PATHS[counter]), > > > > > > + rules.isAllowed(TEST_PATHS[counter]) == > > > RESULTS[counter]); > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + rules = parser.parseRules("testRobotsAgent", > > > > > ROBOTS_STRING_REVERSE.getBytes(), CONTENT_TYPE, MULTIPLE_AGENTS); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + for(int counter = 0; counter < TEST_PATHS.length; > counter++) { > > > > > > + assertTrue("testing on agents (" + MULTIPLE_AGENTS + "), > and " > > > > > > + + "path " + TEST_PATHS[counter] > > > > > > + + " got " + rules.isAllowed(TEST_PATHS[counter]), > > > > > > + rules.isAllowed(TEST_PATHS[counter]) == > > > RESULTS[counter]); > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /** > > > > > > + * Test that the robots rules are interpreted correctly by the > > > robots > > > > > rules parser. > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > public void testRobotsAgent() { > > > > > > rules = parser.parseRules("testRobotsAgent", > > > > > ROBOTS_STRING.getBytes(), CONTENT_TYPE, SINGLE_AGENT); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > > > > > > From:Tejas Patil <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday 24th January 2014 15:24 > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Order of robots file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Markus, > > > > > > > I am trying to understand the problem you described. You meant > that > > > > > with > > > > > > > the original Nutch's robots parsing code, the robots file below > > > allowed > > > > > > > your crawler to crawl stuff: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: * > > > > > > > Disallow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: our_crawler > > > > > > > Allow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But now that started using the change from NUTCH-1031 [0], (ie. > > > > > delegation > > > > > > > of robots parsing to crawler commons), it blocked your > crawler. To > > > make > > > > > > > things work, you had to change your robots file to this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: our_crawler > > > > > > > Allow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: * > > > > > > > Disallow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did I understand the problem correctly ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1031 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Tejas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Markus Jelsma > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am attempting to merge some Nutch changes back to our own. > We > > > > > aren't > > > > > > > > using Nutch' CrawlerCommons impl but the old stuff. But > because > > > of > > > > > > > > recording of response time and rudimentary SSL support i > decided > > > to > > > > > move it > > > > > > > > back to our version. Suddenly i realized a local crawl does > not > > > work > > > > > > > > anymore, it seems because of the order of the robots > definitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: * > > > > > > > > Disallow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: our_crawler > > > > > > > > Allow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does not allow our crawler to fetch URL's. But > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: our_crawler > > > > > > > > Allow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > User-agent: * > > > > > > > > Disallow: / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does! This was not the case before, anyone here aware of > this? By > > > > > design? > > > > > > > > Or is it a flaw? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
