hi everyone,

finally i got nutch 2.x running on hbase-0.94 on hadoop-2.2 without much
struggle,

Talat told gora 0.4 doesn't support hadoop2.x versions, but i don't see any
of those issues.

thanks for your support

-yeshwanth



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:33 PM, yeshwanth kumar <[email protected]>
wrote:

> hi john,
>
> i started with nutch 2.2.1 version.
>
> as everyone suggested i tried 2.x branch which is working on hbase-94.10
> on hadoop-1.2
> i need to check whether it will work on hadoop 2.2.
> i will let you know shortly
>
> -yeshwanth
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi yeshwanth,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:32 AM, <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > i am using hbase 0.94.10 on top of hadoop 2.2.
>> >
>> > now i need to crawl the websites and store the results in hbase.
>> > i saw that nutch doesn't have integration with gora 0.4 and higher
>> versions
>> > of hbase.
>> >
>>
>> Which Nutch version are you talking about? We can't guess this unless you
>> tell us.
>> Please check out Nutch 2.X branch and use this, you will then be able to
>> push Data into HBase 0.94.14 IIRC. Please tell us how you get on and we
>> can
>> work to make sure your stack is working.
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/branches/2.x/
>>
>>
>> >
>> > i went through nutch java api documentation for the possibility of
>> crawling
>> > through custom code.
>> > where i found the nutch is totally dependent on gora.
>> > i don't see any other possible ways here.
>> >
>>
>> Possible ways for what?
>> Nutch 2.X is dependent upon Gora... meaning that it is independent of
>> backends. In theory this is dependent that versions of the backends are
>> backwards compatible. Additionally, I would always advise you to look into
>> the Gora parent pom.xml for versioning.
>> https://github.com/apache/gora/blob/master/pom.xml#L616
>>
>>
>> >
>> > can someone suggest me a  way to store the crawled data using Nutch into
>> > hbase
>> >
>> >
>> > Please see above.
>> hth
>> Lewis
>>
>
>

Reply via email to