Hi Simon, This is quite off topic but nevermind. Feel free to contribute / comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1086>
J. On 15 July 2014 23:13, Simon Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Julien, > > If possible, why not upgrade httpclient 3.1 to httpcomponent 4.4? > We know that httpclient 3.1 is no longer supported since 2008, and it is > not compatible with NTLMv2 authentication. That means if one is behind a > proxy server with NTLMv2, nutch always returns a 407 error. > > I believe this upgrading should be more urgent? > > Thanks > > Simon > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Julien Nioche < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > One of the frequent issues on the mailing list / JIRA is that users can > be > > led to think that Nutch is built with Maven as they can see what looks > like > > a perfectly valid pom.xml at the root of the project. It becomes clearer > > when reading the WIKI or FAQ that ANT should be used instead but it isn't > > an unreasonnable assumption, is it? > > > > As we know this pom.xml is generated automatically when we publish the > > Maven artefacts with the deploy task i.e. it is never done by end users > and > > only when we release a new version. This pom.xml is generated from a > > template file in the ivy dir and uses the ivy dependencies. > > > > This pom.xml file cannot be used to build Nutch core nor the plugins but > > was used by Eclipse users to easily import the project and get the > > dependencies, which can be done very neatly with the 'ant eclipse' task > or > > by using the IvyDE plugin for Eclipse. Moreover there is no guarantee > that > > it is in sync with the content of the Ivy deps. > > > > I suggest that we remove the pom.xml file from the source (and the > > releases) to get rid of this source of confusion. Apart from the > solutions > > I just mentioned to get the dependencies in Eclipse etc... there is > always > > the option of calling 'ant deploy' to generate a fresh new pom.xml if you > > really need one. > > > > Can we please have your views on this? > > > > [+1] yes > > [-1] no, here is why... > > [0] don't mind > > > > Thanks > > > > Julien > > > > -- > > > > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > > > -- Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
