will you use config management like ansible backing vagrant? personally, i find vagrant a pita but the config management often packaged with vagrant the really useful and portable thing
I dont run macs and i would prefer not to use vagrant also On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mo, > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:33 PM, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Sorry for the late reply. > > > Me included. This email was lost in the pile! > > I use Nutch 2.x as it enables me to do analytics over the data I am > crawling. This is my justification for trying to maintain an further the > development on that branch over the last while. > I am also extremely interested in the technologies supported within the > Nutch 2.X stack and I like keeping up with their development and using them > to fix my problems if and when the problems arise. > I like having fine grained control over my storage architecture. This is > also a pro for me. > The performance Julien talks about (and please correct me if I am wrong > Julien) is not so much Nutch related as it is Gora. Different Gora backends > perform differently, this is itself driven by who wishes to maintain them. > > On another note, we've identified that for users, Nutch 2.X is a bloody > pain to provision and get running. This is a problem for this branch and > for the people that invest and possibly waste time trying to determine > revisions, etc. > > It is my intention to build different Vagrant flavours for each Nutch 2.X > stack. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1812 > > If ANYONE on this list is intersted in helping with this effort them I > would dedicate some time to document the process on the wiki so that it can > be reproduced for everyone's benefit. I feel that this would be a huge move > forward for the 2.X branch. > > Lewis > -- -- Nicholas Roberts www.niccolox.org www.bigdatadrupal.org
