How about simply including a Vagrantfile for Nutch in
the trunk?

Then someone would:

svn co https:// or;
git clone https://github.com/apache/nutch
cd nutch
vagrant up

Cheers,
Chris


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 9:09 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Nutch 2.X Vagrent WAS Re: [RELEASE] Apache Nutch 1.9

>Hi Nicholas,
>
>NOTE: Thread name has changed to reflect diversion on topic.
>
>On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:01 AM, <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> will you use config management like ansible backing vagrant?
>>
>
>Well thanks for the links here. The github repos they have indicates that
>they code is GPL licensed meaning that we would not be able to use and
>distribute any of it under the ASLv2.0
>http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
>
>I wonder if you can explain a bit about your expereince with Ansible? I
>have never used it myself. Sorry for the ignorance.
>
>
>>
>> personally, i find vagrant a pita but the config management often
>>packaged
>> with vagrant the really useful and portable thing
>>
>
>+1
>
>
>>
>> I dont run macs and i would prefer not to use vagrant also
>>
>
>Any other suggestion? The goal here is to make 2.X easier to use. Not to
>support any one enabling technology in order to do so. If there are other
>suggestions out there then it would be more than great to hear them.
>Thanks
>Lewis

Reply via email to