Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guys,
> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out performs
> other
> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>
> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100 threads)
>
> Test case:
> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
> String.
> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of that
> many times. Psuedo code:
> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> int index = 0, count = 0;
> int length = data.length;
> while (index++ < iteration) {
> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> }
> }
>
> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>
> Result:
> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>
> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>
> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> See attachments below.
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
