On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incidentally, in analyzing this issue it would seem that the process store > was holding multiple "Active" versions of the same process (so, multiple > PIDs of the same Type in the STORE_PROCESS were Active at the same time). > > I wonder if this development environment, wherein we are using the > DeploymentService to deploy Deployment Units (and thus versioned deployment > directories), combined with a couple different deployments of the ODE > runtime engine was causing these "logically" retired processes to hang > around as Active. > > Going out on a limb here, but does it make sense during times of recovery > that the engine might get confused about which process Type to route to if > there were multiple Active Process IDs of it at the same time? I think that's entirely possible. Matthieu could confirm since he's more familiar with that part of the code. alex
